Follow up, 2003 performance and outcome measure review
Read Online

Follow up, 2003 performance and outcome measure review vocational rehabilitation services to injured workers by Washington (State). Legislature. Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee.

  • 156 Want to read
  • ·
  • 82 Currently reading

Published by The Committee in Olympia, WA .
Written in English


  • Washington (State). -- Dept. of Labor and Industries -- Auditing,
  • Vocational rehabilitation -- Washington (State) -- Evaluation,
  • Workers" compensation -- Washington (State) -- Evaluation

Book details:

Edition Notes

Other titles2003 performance and outcome measure review., Performance and outcome measure review., Vocational rehabilitation services to injured workers.
StatementState of Washington Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC).
SeriesReport -- 05-1., Report (Washington (State). Legislature. Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee) -- 05-1.
ContributionsLerch, Steve., Yates, Cindi.
The Physical Object
Pagination8, [3] p. ;
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL17624175M

Download Follow up, 2003 performance and outcome measure review


Assessment of functional outcomes following THA has been well described. 16 Performance-based measures such as the 6 Minute Walk (6MW) Test, Timed up and Go Test (TUG), and the Stair Climbing Test (SCT) quantify performance with tasks mimicking activities of daily living, as opposed to relying on individuals’ perception of performance. 7,15 Cited by: Physical performance outcome measures involve the performance of specific tasks by a patient in order to establish a baseline indicator of physical performance or evaluate performance abilities on a follow‐up basis. 4 A generalizable limitation of physical performance measures is the inability to capture a comprehensive picture of the Cited by: performance/responses hence changes in condition may be missed. Learning (practice) Effects [1] •Improvement in patient performance of a measure with each attempt. Day to day fluctuation in the variable to be measured [5] What are outcome measures? An outcome measure is a standardized instrument used in clinical andFile Size: KB. 8. Follow-up and documentation. Care management is driven by quality-based outcomes such as: improved/maintained functional status, improved/maintained clinical status, enhanced quality of life, member satisfaction, adherence to the care plan, improved member safety, File Size: KB.

  Outcome Measurement Made Easy with PLA’s Project Outcome Janu YOUR INDISPENSABLE ALLY W W W. P L A. O R G Using Follow-Up Survey Outcomes Assess impact of a program/service after some Measure Outcomes Step 3: Review Results Step 4: Take Action. Take Action Using Size: 3MB. Stuck for what to say in a performance review for an employee? Read our sample paragraphs across 10 different performance categories to help kick-start your writing process. John is a self-motivated team member and a pleasure to work with. He demonstrates superior technical ability and produces work of exceptional quality. Examines how consistently hospitals perform on pairs of outcome measures. Reports variation in risk-standardized Medicare payments for treatment for selected condition- and procedure-specific episodes of care. Explores how a state’s overall performance on measures relates to their performance for patients with and without social risk factors. The BI-RADS ® atlas provides standardized breast imaging terminology, report organization, assessment structure and a classification system for mammography, ultrasound and MRI of the breast. BI-RADS reporting enables radiologists to communicate results to the referring physician clearly and consistently, with a final assessment and specific management recommendations.